In a significant ruling found the Lower Saxony Higher Administrative Court ruled that savings banks are entitled to the operators of to refuse subscription traps an account. Guideline:
Objective grounds, the opening to refuse an account at a bank is present, if the facts justified on serious suspicion that the account should be used for illegal activities, to collect at about false claims.based in its reasoning the court to the fact that different courts evaluate the machinations of the Abofallenbetreiber as attempted fraud and debt collection as an aid to stalking their lawyers.
The applicant was accused by several civil court judgments of complicity in fraud and to assume the costs have been convicted, which were caused by the rejection of unjustified claims raised.Source & complete article: Axel John / right-to-gewiesen.de
[.....]
This applies even more so than the civil courts are increasingly tended to evaluate the activity of the applicant as an accessory to attempted or actual fraud. If one were to follow the opinion of the Administrative Court, the savings would be the rallying point for those who had been rejected at other banks, if evidence relevant criminal activities using the account does not succeed.
0 comments:
Post a Comment